Skip to main content

The Best James Bond?

 



Well, this is sure to stir some controversy. Rank ordering my favorite actors who played James Bond. No mine fields to be had there.

People have very strong opinions about James Bond. Some don’t care for the character at all, but I suspect they won’t be reading this. Again, as I have said in other lists, this is my list. You don’t have to agree with it. And you probably won’t. You are entitled to your opinion. I am entitled to mine.  

I am first going to start by mentioning a few that don’t qualify for the list. Barry Nelson played the first Bond on screen: a television version of Casino Royale in 1954 on the Climax anthology series. I can’t say Barry Nelson would ever come to mind if I were casting James Bond. And this was before most people had ever heard of Bond. The second actor not on my list is David Niven who played Bond in . . . wait for it . . . Casino Royale. The 1967 movie with Peter Sellers. But this was a spoof so it doesn’t really count.  Now the count begins in earnest.

 #6 George Lazenby -- Look, somebody has to be last. Lazenby had the misfortune (or choice) to only be in one film, and it was one where the script was a bit all over the place. Had he the chance to play Bond in other movies, he might have grown into the part and into my affection, but as we only have the one, I must judge him on that one, and I simply like the other actors better.

 #5 Roger Moore – Roger Moore was the first Bond I ever saw at a movie theater. It was Live and Let Die, his first outing. I was a young teen and I thought it was great! The film alas, hasn’t aged well. And as Roger and I got older, I grew tired of his antics. The Moore films were played too much for laughs. For me, at times they were just silly. There are people who Love Moore, love his humor. To me, it just got old.

 #4 Sean Connery – This may shock some people that he is this low on my list. Many consider Connery to be the gold standard when it comes to Bond. And way back in the day, I really liked Connery. But Connery’s portrayal also has not aged well. Looking at the films with modern sensibilities, that Bond seems awfully kind of . . . rapey. Incidents that might have seemed funny in 1964 do not seem so funny today. That is not necessarily Connery’s fault. It may come down to the script and direction. Nonetheless, it does tarnish that portrayal. 

 #3 Pierce Brosnan -- Post Timothy Dalton, Brosnan finally got his chance to play Bond. He had been picked to play Bond after Roger Moore, but contractual obligations prevented that. Brosnan makes a perfectly serviceable Bond. More humor than Dalton, but not as silly as Moore.

 #2 Timothy Dalton – A lot of people did not like Dalton’s performance as Bond. I was not one of them. Anytime you change actors there will be some pushback. People used to one style of acting are put off by another. I really liked Dalton’s performances. I thought they made the most realistic Bond. Let’s face it, James Bond movies are not noted for their believability. But I felt Dalton was believable, and a breath of fresh air after Moore. Dalton was only in two Bond films. I would have liked to see him in more. In fact, he was my number one favorite Bond until . . .

 #1 Daniel Craig – I have to go with Craig for my number one. Even though he plays Bond as more of a loose cannon than most of the others. As I said with Connery, (and it is true for all of these actors) the things the characters were made to do were not necessarily the actors’ choices. Nonetheless, Craig pulled it off. There is a realism there and a grittiness to the character that pulled me in. I think the audience has more empathy with Craig than with the others. We always want James Bond to win, but with Daniel Craig it feels more personal.

Who knows what the future holds for the series, or if there even is a future. But I suspect Bond will return someday. Has the next actor even been born yet?

Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and
2 comments
Read more

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha
Post a Comment
Read more

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t
Post a Comment
Read more