Skip to main content

Hippies

 


When I was a kid, ten or eleven, I was a hippie wannabe. I was too young to be a hippie. But hippies were cool. They were so free, so liberated. I think all my friends wanted the same. It was the late Sixties and hippies were in the news and we could see them around town. Two of my older siblings may have had leanings that way. The third sibling definitely did not.

I did not do drugs and had no plans to ever start. But drugs were not what made you a hippie. Hippies seemed so cool because they were cool by definition. The word hippie comes from “hip.” You had to be hip to be a hippie. Hip was a word coined by an earlier group of outliers called beatniks. Beatniks were a group of poets and artists, and musicians who had the “beat.” Beatniks coined the term “hip.” Beatniks were clear outsiders. They were scoffed at or made fun of by the mainstream population. But some of that attitude of not caring what the mainstream thinks of you, carried on to the next generation. It turns out not worrying about conforming is very freeing. That, coupled with a cause -- the growing mess in Viet Nam -- found the ranks of hippies swelling. The establishment didn’t take the beatniks seriously because there weren’t very many of them. They made fun of them.  But the hippie movement grew to a point that it could not be ignored, could not be just laughed at. A fundamental shift was taking place, the younger generation shifting away from the older.  The older generation did not understand the hippies. People fear what they do not understand and often attack what they fear.

To me, a kid, the larger sociological implications of this shift were lost. I simply saw people that I wanted to emulate, people who cared about the environment, who cared about social justice, who cared about freedom and tried to live free. I was less certain about the Viet Nam War protests. I had been raised a patriotic American, and what was happening in the war was confusing to me.

Hippies were not monolithic. Some did drugs, not all. Some believed in free love, not all. Some were Marxists, not all. Some were Christians; some were atheists; some were Buddhists, etc.  So, what kind of hippie did I want to be? I guess if you had pinned me down, I would have said I wanted to be a sort of  a conservative hippie (as if that weren’t the most ridiculous oxymoronic term you ever heard). My friends were all of similar minds. We were socially and environmentally aware. We loved the idea of freedom. We talked about how when we graduated high school would pool our money together an buy an old school bus. We would convert it into living space and travel the country, all of us, in our bus. It was a romantic notion. No rules. We would just make it up as we went.

It's fine to fantasize about such things when you are eleven. When you get a little older the practicalities start to sink in. Hippies did not worry about practicalities, right? But they started coming unbidden into my mind. It’s all well and good to say you would save up and pool your money, but it would not take long for money to run out. Then how are you going to buy fuel? How are you going to buy food, toilet paper? And one thing I kept coming back to: can you imagine what that bus would smell like after a few weeks?

By the time I was old enough to be a hippie, hippies were waning. They no longer had the cool cachet for me that they once had. I still carried some of that idealism, but I found myself planted firmly in the mainstream. And that was okay. It’s okay to fight for a better world from within the system. That was who I was at that point in my life. Not such a free bird, perhaps a bit boringly conventional. But I think it worked out for the best. The road that was not taken was probably the road that was not meant for you. 

Star Liner

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Second Wind

  You have heard about athletes getting their second wind? It is not that they feel better, that they are warmed up and ready to run more easily. It is not psychological (at least, not all psychological). No. There is an actual physiological truth to a second wind. It all has to do with respiration. When I say respiration, I am not talking about breathing. Respiration is a biochemical process that happens at the cellular level. It is how the cell gets energy. There are lots of chemical processes that are constantly going on in each cell, and those processes require energy. Without a constant feed of energy, the cell will die. The more demands there are on a cell, the more energy it needs. For example, every one of your muscle cells need more energy when you are running.   In fact, you won’t be able to run if the cells don’t have sufficient energy for it. The energy currency of the cell is a molecule called ATP. You may have heard that sugar is how our bodies get energy, wh...

Roy Batty Figures it out

  This is written with the assumption that the reader has seen the film Blade Runner . If you haven’t, you may not get much out of it. In one of the last scenes in Blade Runner , the killer android Roy Batty, who holds Deckard’s life in his hands, has a remarkable speech: “I've seen things... seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate. All those moments... will be lost in time like tears in the rain. Time to die.” I am told that the speech that was written was not working very well, and Rutger Hauer was told to just improvise something. Wow. He nailed it. At this point in the film Roy Batty has been the villain throughout. We have been rooting for Deckard (Harrison Ford) to take him out, but it is not going well, and it seems like Batty is about to kill him. At the last second, Roy Batty pulls Deckard up, to keep him from falling to his death. Then he delivers this...

The Outsider

  I am reading The Outsider by Stephen King. The first 150 pages or so I found disturbing. Not for the reason you might think. It is not scary, not creepy in a traditional horror way, but disturbing in a tragic way. The first hundred to 150 pages is tragedy on top of tragedy. The most disturbing thing to me (it is disturbing to me anytime I encounter it in any story) is a false accusation. A man is falsely accused and may well be convicted of a horrific crime. That kind of thing disturbs my soul. It makes the whole world seem wrong. I have always been disturbed by stories with that kind of thing. And why not? It happens in real life too. That makes it all the more horrific. In the Jim Crow South, all you had to do was make an accusation against a black man to set the lynch mob in action. No need to bother with a trial. But even if there was a trial, the outcome was a foregone conclusion, innocent or not. We see Vladimir Putin inventing charges against people and they get locked up...