Skip to main content

Sentience vs Sapience

 



At what point will computers become sentient? At what point will they become sapient? What’s the difference?

Webster’s defines sentient as “1: Responsiveness to or conscious of sense impressions. 2: Aware. 3: Finely sensitive in perception or feelings”.

Webster’s defines sapient as “possessing or expressing great sagacity” (wisdom).

Science fiction stories speculate about humanity meeting a sentient or a sapient species. Some stories use the two terms interchangeably, but they are quite different. A sentient species is one that is aware of their environment. They are sensitive to their surroundings and other organisms around them. As a standard, this is not high bar. There are even plants that can sense their surroundings and react accordingly. They could be called sentient.

Meeting alien life that is sapient is where things get interesting. This is where things like the “Prime Directive” in Star Trek would come into play. The idea that sapient life should be allowed to evolve without interference from the more advanced civilizations seems like a reasonable rule. The scientific name of our species would indicate that we are sapient. Homo sapiens: Homo meaning Man and sapiens meaning wise. There are other extinct species of the genus Homo: Homo habilis, Homo erectus, Homo neanderthalensis, but the one that survived is Homo sapiens: the wise humans (well, that’s debatable). It is all well and good for us to call ourselves wise, but this brings up a problem. Alien life is, well, alien. We have our own idea about what wisdom is, that is, we think it’s like us. But what if it is not like us. Will we recognize wisdom if it is radically different?

The same could be said of artificial intelligence. We have the Turing Test, a hypothetical test designed by computer legend Alan Turing. In this test, a person would be in a blind communication with two others, one human and one machine. If the person could not reliably tell which one was the machine, the machine would then have passed the test. But what does that really tell us? It might just tell us that this machine could imitate humans. Is that sapience? Like the alien, machine intelligence might develop in a way so foreign to us (or so advanced) as to be unrecognizable. The fact that humans designed it might not make a difference. It seems to me after attaining a certain level of complexity, one has to assume that artificial intelligence will evolve just like life evolves, that is, unpredictably (although much faster).

What makes a being (natural or machine) a person? Is it sapience? Is it self-awareness? Webster’s notwithstanding, do we really even know what those terms mean when we are talking about something alien to ourselves? Advanced artificial intelligence won’t think like we do and therefore won’t act like we expect.  We and AI will not be able to conceive of ourselves, the world, or each other in the same way. If the day ever comes when artificial intelligence exterminates the human race, it won’t be because the machines are evil. It will likely just be a simple misunderstanding.

Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Retired

  I retired this week. So, big lifestyle changes for me? Not so much. I retired on Thursday. My office had an amazing party for me on Wednesday, lots of food, lots of cards, lots of personal connections. Gifts too, I wish I had told them, no gifts. I really don’t need anything. But all this does make one feel appreciated. It also makes me feel appreciated that they want me to come back on a contractual basis every now and then to impart my institutional knowledge. It is always the case when someone retires, knowledge is lost to the organization. Things have to be relearned by the next generation. This is somewhat offset by the fact that the world is changing through advancing technology etc. So, the knowledge that the retiring person has might eventually become obsolete anyway. Better to go out while you are still on top. We have all seen professional athletes who stayed on well beyond their prime. It would have been better to go out while still on top. But it is a hard thing to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

All That We See or Seem by Ken Liu

My first experience with cyberpunk as a genre of science fiction was Neuromancer by William Gibson. Neuromancer was one of the early works that defined the cyberpunk genre. It was insanely influential. It won the Hugo Award, the Nebula Award, the Philip K. Dick Award. But for me, it just did not resonate. I had a hard time visualizing the concepts. It left a bad taste in my mouth for cyberpunk. I mostly avoided the genre. Then a couple of years ago I read Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson which is cyberpunk (although some people say it is a parody of cyberpunk). Whatever, I liked it. I recently picked up All That We See or Seem by Ken Liu and it immediately became apparent to me that this was cyberpunk. Julia Z is the main character, and I think this is going to be the start of a series following her. She is a hacker (hence cyberpunk). She has got herself in trouble and so she lives on the margins, barely making it. Then a lawyer asks her for her help. His wife has been kidnapped. The ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Darkness

  There was a moment when I discovered that l liked dark music. I do like dark music. I like minor keys and a haunting theme. I like other kinds of music too, but that darkness speaks to me in a special way. What does that say about me? Am I messed up? I don’t think so. Maybe I am just built that way that haunting tunes or lyrics imparts some inner truth to me. It resonates. I know precisely when I discovered this about myself. It was Summer of 1971. I was 12 years old. I was on a plane with my family heading to Illinois. Airplanes back then did not have much in the way of entertainment, but what they did have were headphones and music channels you could listen to. I was listening to a channel of popular current hits, and a song came on called “That’s the Way I Always Heard it Should Be” by Carly Simon. I had never heard of Carly Simon. This was before “Anticipation” and “You’re so Vain.” She was not yet famous. But this song came on and, I don’t know, it did something to me. It...
Post a Comment
Read more