Skip to main content

Sentience vs Sapience

 



At what point will computers become sentient? At what point will they become sapient? What’s the difference?

Webster’s defines sentient as “1: Responsiveness to or conscious of sense impressions. 2: Aware. 3: Finely sensitive in perception or feelings”.

Webster’s defines sapient as “possessing or expressing great sagacity” (wisdom).

Science fiction stories speculate about humanity meeting a sentient or a sapient species. Some stories use the two terms interchangeably, but they are quite different. A sentient species is one that is aware of their environment. They are sensitive to their surroundings and other organisms around them. As a standard, this is not high bar. There are even plants that can sense their surroundings and react accordingly. They could be called sentient.

Meeting alien life that is sapient is where things get interesting. This is where things like the “Prime Directive” in Star Trek would come into play. The idea that sapient life should be allowed to evolve without interference from the more advanced civilizations seems like a reasonable rule. The scientific name of our species would indicate that we are sapient. Homo sapiens: Homo meaning Man and sapiens meaning wise. There are other extinct species of the genus Homo: Homo habilis, Homo erectus, Homo neanderthalensis, but the one that survived is Homo sapiens: the wise humans (well, that’s debatable). It is all well and good for us to call ourselves wise, but this brings up a problem. Alien life is, well, alien. We have our own idea about what wisdom is, that is, we think it’s like us. But what if it is not like us. Will we recognize wisdom if it is radically different?

The same could be said of artificial intelligence. We have the Turing Test, a hypothetical test designed by computer legend Alan Turing. In this test, a person would be in a blind communication with two others, one human and one machine. If the person could not reliably tell which one was the machine, the machine would then have passed the test. But what does that really tell us? It might just tell us that this machine could imitate humans. Is that sapience? Like the alien, machine intelligence might develop in a way so foreign to us (or so advanced) as to be unrecognizable. The fact that humans designed it might not make a difference. It seems to me after attaining a certain level of complexity, one has to assume that artificial intelligence will evolve just like life evolves, that is, unpredictably (although much faster).

What makes a being (natural or machine) a person? Is it sapience? Is it self-awareness? Webster’s notwithstanding, do we really even know what those terms mean when we are talking about something alien to ourselves? Advanced artificial intelligence won’t think like we do and therefore won’t act like we expect.  We and AI will not be able to conceive of ourselves, the world, or each other in the same way. If the day ever comes when artificial intelligence exterminates the human race, it won’t be because the machines are evil. It will likely just be a simple misunderstanding.

Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Second Wind

  You have heard about athletes getting their second wind? It is not that they feel better, that they are warmed up and ready to run more easily. It is not psychological (at least, not all psychological). No. There is an actual physiological truth to a second wind. It all has to do with respiration. When I say respiration, I am not talking about breathing. Respiration is a biochemical process that happens at the cellular level. It is how the cell gets energy. There are lots of chemical processes that are constantly going on in each cell, and those processes require energy. Without a constant feed of energy, the cell will die. The more demands there are on a cell, the more energy it needs. For example, every one of your muscle cells need more energy when you are running.   In fact, you won’t be able to run if the cells don’t have sufficient energy for it. The energy currency of the cell is a molecule called ATP. You may have heard that sugar is how our bodies get energy, which is tr
1 comment
Read more

Roy Batty Figures it out

  This is written with the assumption that the reader has seen the film Blade Runner . If you haven’t, you may not get much out of it. In one of the last scenes in Blade Runner , the killer android Roy Batty, who holds Deckard’s life in his hands, has a remarkable speech: “I've seen things... seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate. All those moments... will be lost in time like tears in the rain. Time to die.” I am told that the speech that was written was not working very well, and Rutger Hauer was told to just improvise something. Wow. He nailed it. At this point in the film Roy Batty has been the villain throughout. We have been rooting for Deckard (Harrison Ford) to take him out, but it is not going well, and it seems like Batty is about to kill him. At the last second, Roy Batty pulls Deckard up, to keep him from falling to his death. Then he delivers this
Post a Comment
Read more

The Outsider

  I am reading The Outsider by Stephen King. The first 150 pages or so I found disturbing. Not for the reason you might think. It is not scary, not creepy in a traditional horror way, but disturbing in a tragic way. The first hundred to 150 pages is tragedy on top of tragedy. The most disturbing thing to me (it is disturbing to me anytime I encounter it in any story) is a false accusation. A man is falsely accused and may well be convicted of a horrific crime. That kind of thing disturbs my soul. It makes the whole world seem wrong. I have always been disturbed by stories with that kind of thing. And why not? It happens in real life too. That makes it all the more horrific. In the Jim Crow South, all you had to do was make an accusation against a black man to set the lynch mob in action. No need to bother with a trial. But even if there was a trial, the outcome was a foregone conclusion, innocent or not. We see Vladimir Putin inventing charges against people and they get locked up (or
1 comment
Read more