Skip to main content

Sentience vs Sapience

 



At what point will computers become sentient? At what point will they become sapient? What’s the difference?

Webster’s defines sentient as “1: Responsiveness to or conscious of sense impressions. 2: Aware. 3: Finely sensitive in perception or feelings”.

Webster’s defines sapient as “possessing or expressing great sagacity” (wisdom).

Science fiction stories speculate about humanity meeting a sentient or a sapient species. Some stories use the two terms interchangeably, but they are quite different. A sentient species is one that is aware of their environment. They are sensitive to their surroundings and other organisms around them. As a standard, this is not high bar. There are even plants that can sense their surroundings and react accordingly. They could be called sentient.

Meeting alien life that is sapient is where things get interesting. This is where things like the “Prime Directive” in Star Trek would come into play. The idea that sapient life should be allowed to evolve without interference from the more advanced civilizations seems like a reasonable rule. The scientific name of our species would indicate that we are sapient. Homo sapiens: Homo meaning Man and sapiens meaning wise. There are other extinct species of the genus Homo: Homo habilis, Homo erectus, Homo neanderthalensis, but the one that survived is Homo sapiens: the wise humans (well, that’s debatable). It is all well and good for us to call ourselves wise, but this brings up a problem. Alien life is, well, alien. We have our own idea about what wisdom is, that is, we think it’s like us. But what if it is not like us. Will we recognize wisdom if it is radically different?

The same could be said of artificial intelligence. We have the Turing Test, a hypothetical test designed by computer legend Alan Turing. In this test, a person would be in a blind communication with two others, one human and one machine. If the person could not reliably tell which one was the machine, the machine would then have passed the test. But what does that really tell us? It might just tell us that this machine could imitate humans. Is that sapience? Like the alien, machine intelligence might develop in a way so foreign to us (or so advanced) as to be unrecognizable. The fact that humans designed it might not make a difference. It seems to me after attaining a certain level of complexity, one has to assume that artificial intelligence will evolve just like life evolves, that is, unpredictably (although much faster).

What makes a being (natural or machine) a person? Is it sapience? Is it self-awareness? Webster’s notwithstanding, do we really even know what those terms mean when we are talking about something alien to ourselves? Advanced artificial intelligence won’t think like we do and therefore won’t act like we expect.  We and AI will not be able to conceive of ourselves, the world, or each other in the same way. If the day ever comes when artificial intelligence exterminates the human race, it won’t be because the machines are evil. It will likely just be a simple misunderstanding.

Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Trip Home

  My wife and I recently returned from a trip to New York to visit my son and his wife. What follows is an excerpt of my notes from that trip. Departure day. So we and the kids (adult kids) leave by 5:30 AM. These “kids” are night owls. They rarely wake before 10:00 if they don’t have to, so we appreciate the sacrifice. Daughter-in-Law (DIL) drove us the 30 minutes to the train station. Hugs and good-byes for her (we love DIL. DIL is an irresistible force). Son navigates us a route to the platform with fewer stairs than the way we came. We get a ticket and get on the train headed for the big city and Grand Central Station. I soon realize that this train is not an express train like the one we took coming out. Instead of taking a little over an hour like we did before, this one would take a little over an hour and a half. We stop at places with names like Cold Springs and Peekskill (on this trip we saw a lot of place names that ended in “kill” including Kaatskill, i.e. Catskill, and
2 comments
Read more

That 70's Decade

  Can a decade become a caricature? My teen years were in the 1970’s and none of us who lived through the 70’s thought our decade was going to be a figure of fun. When you are a part of it, you don’t realize what people are going to make fun of later. I think there are two reasons why people snicker when the 70’s are mentioned: clothing styles and Disco. Both things could be called extensions of trends that started in the 60’s. When the hippy styles of the 60’s became more formalized for the dance floor, the result was (in hindsight) rather bizarre. They did not seem bizarre at the time. People following present fashion trends never understand that they are wearing something that will be laughed at in ten years. Yes, I did have a pair of bell-bottom blue jeans (are they making a comeback?) The mere mention of the 1970’s conjures up someone in a ridiculous pose wearing a disco suit. We who lived through the 70’s just went about our normal life. There were quite a lot of things that ha
Post a Comment
Read more

Tyranny of the Masses

  I was listening to Benjamin Netanyahu on the radio. He was justifying his change in the law that removed power from the Israeli Supreme Court, saying that it was the will of the people. Majority rules. This made me think of “Tyranny of the masses,” a concept that notes: just because a majority of people are for something, that doesn’t make it right. I am sure you can think of historical examples where the people of a country supported a policy that was demonstrably wrong. When everything is completely governed by majority rule, the rights of the minority can be subverted by the majority. The framers of our American Constitution knew this, and tried to put in some checks and balances into our system of government. This was to guard against all forms of tyranny whether from a dictator, or from tyranny of the masses. One of those checks is that we have a representative government. The people themselves don’t pass laws, but instead elect representatives at the federal and local level t
Post a Comment
Read more