Skip to main content

Trust


 

When we take a drink of water, we trust that the water service people are doing their job so we won’t get sick. When we push the button on an elevator, we trust that it has been well maintained so we won’t go crashing to the ground. When we call 911, we trust that the dispatchers and emergency responders will do their job and help is on the way. Some of these things we don’t even think about, we just unconsciously trust. We don’t ask if the air traffic controller is a Republican or a Democrat, a Buddhist or a Muslem, white or black. We don’t think about it. We just trust them to do their job. Without trust, there is no society, there is no civilization. We would all be huddled in our caves guarding what we have with clubs.

But trust seems to be in some danger. For the past few years, the tides have been not so gently eroding away the bank of trust.

Trust used to be harder to break. Before the internet, before social media, if you wanted to break down trust in an institution or a person, you had to rely on radio and television, or before that, pamphlets and public speeches. It was difficult, but by no means impossible. Hitler did it. Various schisms in various religions relied on information or disinformation campaigns that sometimes succeeded. Many wars were started by getting people to believe that the “others” could not be trusted.

But nowadays the breaking of trust is as easy as posting your next tweet. You can invent any wild conspiracy theory you want. For example, you could state that people who wear brown shoes . . . no, I am not going to invent a crazy image, because someone would believe it and start posting it and I don’t want the blood of brown-shoed people on my hands.

There is misinformation and there is disinformation. If someone is spreading misinformation, they are simply spreading information that is wrong, that they are mistaken about. Disinformation is knowingly spreading false information. It is propaganda. Disinformation is evil.

Trust works both ways. It is the responsibility of the person posting it who knows that it is disinformation and knows that it will cause harm, or perhaps they aren’t sure but they post it anyway. Posting spurious information is like giving aid to a terrorist. But it is also the responsibility of the viewer, or the listener. If you choose to believe crazy stuff you see online or on a podcast you are part of the problem. If you choose to share it, you are a bigger part of the problem.

Radio commentator Paul Harvey used to say “self-government cannot exist without self-discipline.” On this we agree.

Star Liner

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Child of the . . .

  What was it like to grow up as a child in the 90s? How about the 1940’s? Thinking about a child growing up in each different decade, conjures up images in my mind. But that is all they are: images. I was a child in the 1960’s. I can tell you what it felt like to be growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, but what it felt like to me is not what the history books remember. History will tell you the 60’s was about the Viet Nam War, civil rights, and the space race. The 70’s was Disco and Watergate. I remember being aware of all of those things, but to me this era was about finding time to play with my friends, something I probably share with a child of any decade. It was about navigating the social intricacies of school.   It was about the Beatles, Three Dog Night, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Jefferson Airplane. It was Bullwinkle, the Wonderful World of Color, and Ed Sullivan. There are things that a kid pays attention to that the grown-ups don’t. Then there are things the adults ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bureaucrats

  I am one of those nameless, faceless bureaucrats. Yes, that is my job. Though I actually have a name; I even am rumored to have a face. Bureau is the French word for desk, so you could say bureaucrats are “desk people.” In short, I work for the government. I sometimes have to deliver unpleasant news to a taxpayer. I sometimes have to tell them that the deed they recorded won’t work and they will have to record another one with corrections. Or we can’t process their deed until they pay their taxes. I can understand why some of these things upset people. The thing is, we don’t decide these things. It is not the bureaucrats that make the laws. The legislature writes the laws. We are required to follow the law.   If you are going to get mad at someone, get mad at the legislature. Or maybe get mad at the voters who voted the legislature in (That’s you, by the way). The same thing happens when the voters vote in a new district, or vote for a bond, or a new operating levy for an ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Telephonicus domesticus

Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone from 1877 bears about as much similarity to the modern smart phone as an abacus bears to a PC or Mac. There are just about as many leaps in technology in both cases. It’s funny how a major jump in technology happens (like the actual invention of the phone). Then there are some refinements over a few years or decades until it gets to a useful stable form. Then it stays virtually the same for many years with only minor innovations. The telephone was virtually unchanged from sometime before I was born until I was about forty. Push-buttons were replacing the rotary dial, but that was about it. (Isn’t it interesting though that when we call someone, we still call it “dialing?” I have never seen a dial on a cell phone.) Cell phones were introduced and (once they became cheap enough) they changed the way we phone each other. New advancements followed soon after, texting and then smart phones. Personal computers were also becoming commonplace and wer...
Post a Comment
Read more