Skip to main content

The Simplest Solution

 

William of Occam or Ockham was a 14th Century philosopher and theologian. He is credited with coming up with a concept which has come to be known as “Occam’s razor.”

Simply put, Occam’s razor states that when you are trying to find an explanation to something you observe, the simplest explanation is usually the correct one. For example: you walk into a room that is supposed to have a dog and a bird in it. The dog is there, but not the bird, though pasted to the dog’s mouth are some bloody feathers. Now, you could come up with all kinds of theories about what happened to the bird. Matter displacement, some spy came in and stole the bird, you were lied to about the bird in the first place, or maybe it is the first case of an object turning invisible. But the simplest explanation (the dog ate the bird) is the most likely to be correct. Scientists and mathematicians use Occam’s razor as part of their basic guidelines (No, I am not sure where the "razor" part comes from).

I think I have developed a corollary to Occam. If you are in a disagreement with someone who is an expert in the field that includes what you are disagreeing about, you are probably wrong. I use this in my everyday work as a cartographer. Sometimes I will be mapping a survey or a subdivision plat made by a surveyor and I come upon something that does not make sense. The end point of the survey does not come out at the beginning. Or it seems to be going northeast when it should be going northwest. Something is clearly wrong. What I do not do is say, “that surveyor screwed up!” The surveyor is a licensed professional and his survey probably went through several cross-checks before he recorded it. I am jus a cartographer trying to retrace his steps. Who is more likely to be wrong? Me! It is possible that the surveyor made a mistake, but I don’t start out with that premise. I go over it again to find where I made the mistake. Only after looking at additional information (other surveys) and run it out several times with the same result, can I begin to suspect that the surveyor made an error. But nine out of ten times when I find a problem, the error is on my part, not the surveyor’s.

We can take this corollary into daily life. If I experience a blizzard and say “hmm, seems like it is getting colder.” But every climate scientist in the world says the Earth is, on average, getting warmer. I am just looking at one data point whereas they are looking at a hundred years of climate data. Plus, they are the experts! They have been trained and studied and run experiments and computer modeling. And they are ALL in agreement. So, they are the ones who are right.

It is the simplest explanation.

Star Liner

Comments

  1. Great article. Very helpful. The problem with climate scientists however is so many of them are in disagreement. And then there is bias built in depending on the funding. Same with doctors and the pharmaceutical and many other industries. Built in bias due to the financial incentives.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

All That We See or Seem by Ken Liu

My first experience with cyberpunk as a genre of science fiction was Neuromancer by William Gibson. Neuromancer was one of the early works that defined the cyberpunk genre. It was insanely influential. It won the Hugo Award, the Nebula Award, the Philip K. Dick Award. But for me, it just did not resonate. I had a hard time visualizing the concepts. It left a bad taste in my mouth for cyberpunk. I mostly avoided the genre. Then a couple of years ago I read Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson which is cyberpunk (although some people say it is a parody of cyberpunk). Whatever, I liked it. I recently picked up All That We See or Seem by Ken Liu and it immediately became apparent to me that this was cyberpunk. Julia Z is the main character, and I think this is going to be the start of a series following her. She is a hacker (hence cyberpunk). She has got herself in trouble and so she lives on the margins, barely making it. Then a lawyer asks her for her help. His wife has been kidnapped. The ...

The Linear Nature of Time

    Go Go back Go back to the time before Before you did it Before they did it Before it was done to you Before the toast fell on the floor Before the catastrophe Before the mistake Before time’s scars Before   Go Go back Redeem it Rework it Fix it Go back   No you cannot Go back Star Liner

The Screaming Silence

  As I have mentioned, I worked for two seasons on the Spotted Owl Survey for the US Forest Service back in the day. This involved setting up stations around areas that were scheduled for timber harvesting to see if there were owls nesting there. We would look at a topographic map and see where we needed to put stations (usually along logging roads) so that we could get complete coverage of the area to be harvested. We would go out during the day and mark these stations with ribbons, then at night we would go to each station and “hoot” for ten minutes. If we did not get a response, we would move on to the next station and so on until we could be sure there were no spotted owls in the vicinity. This meant we were working at night in the woods. There is a lot of wildlife activity at night in the woods. It is not just owls, a fair number of wildlife are nocturnal. We saw coyotes, bobcats, cougars, bats, frogs, deer, elk, among other things. But it was not just seeing the wildlife, ...